Rail freight push targets millions of HGV journeys on UK roads

You can read this article in 4 minutes

Rail freight has been put back on the Westminster agenda after MPs debated whether more goods should be moved by train to cut HGV journeys, congestion and emissions on Britain’s roads.

The debate, held in Westminster Hall on 3 June, focused on the role of rail freight in the UK transport network. MPs were told that rail currently carries only around 7% of UK freight, compared with a European average of about 19%, despite the sector’s claims that it already removes millions of HGV journeys from the road each year.

According to figures cited in the debate, rail freight prevents around 7 million HGV journeys annually and contributes about £2.5bn in economic and social value. The government has also reiterated its target to grow rail freight by at least 75% by 2050.

The discussion comes as the UK continues to face pressure on road capacity, driver availability, emissions reduction and supply chain resilience. Supporters of rail freight argue that moving more long-distance and bulk freight by train could ease congestion on key road corridors, reduce road wear and support decarbonisation without removing the need for HGVs in first- and last-mile operations.

The practical question is how far this shift can go. Rail freight is most competitive on longer-distance, high-volume flows, especially container traffic, aggregates, construction materials and goods moving between ports, terminals and distribution hubs. Much of the UK’s domestic freight market still depends on road transport because of flexibility, delivery speed, customer locations and the lack of suitable rail-connected sites.

The 2050 growth target was first set by the Department for Transport in 2023. The government said at the time that increasing rail freight would support economic growth while taking lorries off roads and cutting emissions and congestion. The target refers to growth in freight moved by rail, rather than a fixed modal-share target.

The debate also highlighted a long-running concern in the logistics sector: rail freight growth depends not only on political support, but also on terminal capacity, network access, timetable planning and investment in routes that can handle heavier and longer freight trains.

Industry bodies have repeatedly warned that freight operators need certainty over access to the rail network, particularly as rail reform progresses and Great British Railways takes shape. Without reliable paths, terminal development and competitive costs, modal shift from road to rail is unlikely to happen at the scale ministers want.

Even with faster rail freight growth, HGVs would remain central to UK logistics. Most rail freight movements still require road transport at one or both ends of the journey, while many retail, food, parcel, construction and regional distribution flows are not easily transferred to rail.

The Westminster Hall debate nevertheless shows that rail freight is being positioned more firmly as part of the UK’s answer to congestion, infrastructure pressure and freight decarbonisation. The challenge for government and industry is whether the policy ambition can be matched by practical investment and commercially workable intermodal routes.

Tags:

Also read