TransInfo
Freight ForwardingTransportLogistics
EU accelerates: end of cheap parcels from China already in 2026

EU accelerates: end of cheap parcels from China already in 2026

dr Izabella Tymińska

dr Izabella Tymińska 17.11.2025

Hapag-Lloyd is moving record volumes, but margins have collapsed

Hapag-Lloyd is moving record volumes, but margins have collapsed

Truck fires: MAN responds to diesel engine risks: shorter oil change intervals and expanded bearing replacement

Truck fires: MAN responds to diesel engine risks: shorter oil change intervals and expanded bearing replacement

Recommended

Drivers receive high fines for ‘lack of GNSS signal’. What can be done to avoid themAcross Italy, hauliers re reporting a surge in fines reaching several thousand euros for alleged ‘malfunctions’ of second-generation smart tachographs. The problem is that – according to explanations from the Italian Ministry of the Interior and EU institutions – in many cases there is no malfunction at all, only a temporary anomaly in the GNSS signal. And that is a fundamental difference. In recent months, Italian drivers and carriers have reported an increasing number of cases involving expensive and severe penalties imposed for the alleged ‘missing GNSS transmission’ in second-generation smart tachographs (G2V2), as reported by the Italian transport press. Control protocols most often record the phrase: ‘lack of GNSS signal’. On this basis, the authorities apply Article 179 of the Italian Road Code – a regulation intended for vehicles with a manipulated or non-functioning tachograph. The sanctions are very severe: from 866 to 3,464 euros, the possible suspension of the driving licence for up to three months, 10 penalty points, and joint liability for the company. However, this is a misinterpretation by the authorities. It should be recalled that the Italian Ministry of the Interior indicated in a circular from February 2024 that errors ‘!1C’ and ‘!0F’ do not indicate a failure but a ‘simple software anomaly or temporary problem with satellite signal authentication’. Such an event does not render the tachograph faulty. The device continues to function, records data, and remains compliant with the law. EU regulations (including EU Regulation 799/2016) also clearly distinguish an anomaly from a failure, and classify the lack of GNSS signal in the former category. What is the problem with GNSS? It is often external interference The issue was highlighted by the Council of the European Union in a document dated 21 May 2025, which points to the growing number of GNSS signal disruptions (jamming and spoofing). Their main sources are Russia and Belarus, and the effects are felt not only by lorries but also by ships and aircraft. In such cases, the responsibility of the driver or carrier for a temporary loss of signal is obviously excluded. What should carriers do to avoid unjust fines? It is not about avoiding inspections, but about asserting your rights and preparing documentation properly. To avoid fines in cases of GNSS signal loss, you should: Immediately secure data from the tachograph and record the error code This is the key evidence. Codes ‘!1C’ and ‘!0F’ indicate an anomaly, not a malfunction, and may determine whether the fine is annulled. Demand that the authorities precisely indicate the legal basis The carrier or driver has the full right to ask inspectors to justify why they classify the anomaly as a ‘failure’. It often turns out that officers incorrectly apply Article 179. Request an assessment from a tachograph service centre An authorised service centre can confirm that the device is functioning correctly and that the issue concerned only the GNSS signal. Such a document is a very strong argument in an appeal. Attach EU documents and ministerial interpretations to the appeal Explanations from the Ministry of the Interior and provisions of EU Regulation 799/2016 clearly state that such anomalies are not failures. In practice, it is often enough simply to refer to these documents for the fine to be overturned. Implement a company procedure for handling GNSS signal loss This could be a short instruction for the driver: • record the time and place, • report the issue to the dispatcher, • take a screenshot of the error code, • report the incident upon return to the company. Such simple actions allow for an effective defence in the event of an inspection. Additionally, carriers should properly train drivers and explain the difference between an ‘anomaly’ and a ‘failure’. Many drivers unknowingly accept the fine, assuming that enforcement officers know the regulations better. It is important during an inspection to verify the technical and legal grounds for the fine.

Drivers receive high fines for ‘lack of GNSS signal’. What can be done to avoid themAcross Italy, hauliers re reporting a surge in fines reaching several thousand euros for alleged ‘malfunctions’ of second-generation smart tachographs. The problem is that – according to explanations from the Italian Ministry of the Interior and EU institutions – in many cases there is no malfunction at all, only a temporary anomaly in the GNSS signal. And that is a fundamental difference. In recent months, Italian drivers and carriers have reported an increasing number of cases involving expensive and severe penalties imposed for the alleged ‘missing GNSS transmission’ in second-generation smart tachographs (G2V2), as reported by the Italian transport press. Control protocols most often record the phrase: ‘lack of GNSS signal’. On this basis, the authorities apply Article 179 of the Italian Road Code – a regulation intended for vehicles with a manipulated or non-functioning tachograph. The sanctions are very severe: from 866 to 3,464 euros, the possible suspension of the driving licence for up to three months, 10 penalty points, and joint liability for the company. However, this is a misinterpretation by the authorities. It should be recalled that the Italian Ministry of the Interior indicated in a circular from February 2024 that errors ‘!1C’ and ‘!0F’ do not indicate a failure but a ‘simple software anomaly or temporary problem with satellite signal authentication’. Such an event does not render the tachograph faulty. The device continues to function, records data, and remains compliant with the law. EU regulations (including EU Regulation 799/2016) also clearly distinguish an anomaly from a failure, and classify the lack of GNSS signal in the former category. What is the problem with GNSS? It is often external interference The issue was highlighted by the Council of the European Union in a document dated 21 May 2025, which points to the growing number of GNSS signal disruptions (jamming and spoofing). Their main sources are Russia and Belarus, and the effects are felt not only by lorries but also by ships and aircraft. In such cases, the responsibility of the driver or carrier for a temporary loss of signal is obviously excluded. What should carriers do to avoid unjust fines? It is not about avoiding inspections, but about asserting your rights and preparing documentation properly. To avoid fines in cases of GNSS signal loss, you should: Immediately secure data from the tachograph and record the error code This is the key evidence. Codes ‘!1C’ and ‘!0F’ indicate an anomaly, not a malfunction, and may determine whether the fine is annulled. Demand that the authorities precisely indicate the legal basis The carrier or driver has the full right to ask inspectors to justify why they classify the anomaly as a ‘failure’. It often turns out that officers incorrectly apply Article 179. Request an assessment from a tachograph service centre An authorised service centre can confirm that the device is functioning correctly and that the issue concerned only the GNSS signal. Such a document is a very strong argument in an appeal. Attach EU documents and ministerial interpretations to the appeal Explanations from the Ministry of the Interior and provisions of EU Regulation 799/2016 clearly state that such anomalies are not failures. In practice, it is often enough simply to refer to these documents for the fine to be overturned. Implement a company procedure for handling GNSS signal loss This could be a short instruction for the driver: • record the time and place, • report the issue to the dispatcher, • take a screenshot of the error code, • report the incident upon return to the company. Such simple actions allow for an effective defence in the event of an inspection. Additionally, carriers should properly train drivers and explain the difference between an ‘anomaly’ and a ‘failure’. Many drivers unknowingly accept the fine, assuming that enforcement officers know the regulations better. It is important during an inspection to verify the technical and legal grounds for the fine.

Daily over 1,000 kilometres: electric truck proves long-distance viability in Sweden

Daily over 1,000 kilometres: electric truck proves long-distance viability in Sweden

EU driving-licence reforms explained: what hauliers and lorry drivers need to know

EU driving-licence reforms explained: what hauliers and lorry drivers need to know

Newest articles

Daimler Truck expands hydrogen trials but infrastructure delays slow rollout

Daimler Truck expands hydrogen trials but infrastructure delays slow rollout

Freight rates rise again. The market enters Q4 with mixed signals

Freight rates rise again. The market enters Q4 with mixed signals

Heavy vans to pay truck tolls in Netherlands

Heavy vans to pay truck tolls in Netherlands

Lane closures on A14 Orwell Bridge

Lane closures on A14 Orwell Bridge

New wave of truck inspections to hit Europe next week

New wave of truck inspections to hit Europe next week

IVECO trials new safety tech that alerts vehicles to unseen road risks

IVECO trials new safety tech that alerts vehicles to unseen road risks

Toll increase in Austria: Transport industry calls for another protest drive

Toll increase in Austria: Transport industry calls for another protest drive

Mercedes-Benz Trucks unveils next-gen safety tech ahead of 2026 EU rules

Mercedes-Benz Trucks unveils next-gen safety tech ahead of 2026 EU rules

See more articles ↓

Latest news from the world of transport

Supply chains face years of instability. Logistics firms prepare for disruptions

Supply chains face years of instability. Logistics firms prepare for disruptions

CMA CGM acquires stake in Hamburg terminal. This is part of a broader cooperation

CMA CGM acquires stake in Hamburg terminal. This is part of a broader cooperation

Tanks, planning, partnerships: why Europe’s security depends on logistics

Tanks, planning, partnerships: why Europe’s security depends on logistics

FORLAND Set to Host Global Partners Conference 2026 in Qingdao, China

FORLAND Set to Host Global Partners Conference 2026 in Qingdao, China

Waberer’s: profits climb but trucking revenue contracts

Waberer’s: profits climb but trucking revenue contracts

60,000 a year or paralysis. The UK in the race for truck drivers

60,000 a year or paralysis. The UK in the race for truck drivers

Traffic examiner jobs that pay more than you earn. With just a car licence

Traffic examiner jobs that pay more than you earn. With just a car licence

Eight years after its dramatic debut Tesla refreshes Semi truck

Eight years after its dramatic debut Tesla refreshes Semi truck

Houthis pause Red Sea attacks after Gaza ceasefire. Is this the end of disruptions in maritime trade?

Houthis pause Red Sea attacks after Gaza ceasefire. Is this the end of disruptions in maritime trade?

The real numbers behind eCMR: 70% cost reduction, 60% time savings

The real numbers behind eCMR: 70% cost reduction, 60% time savings

French region introduces new road toll for trucks

French region introduces new road toll for trucks

CMA CGM expands rail services between Adriatic ports and Central Europe

CMA CGM expands rail services between Adriatic ports and Central Europe